For some reason the Pearlmans didn't acquire Picasso and Matisse; but it was rather refreshing to see early modernist works without the presence of these two Masters. There were works by Lipchitz, van Gogh, Soutine, Modigiliani, Degas, Sisley (a lovely account of a river scene , colours rippling across the pictorial plane) and a remarkable relief piece by Gauguin, 'Te Fare Amu'. The show as a whole brought across the sense of intense exploration and excitement in the early twentieth century, as new pictorial vocabularies were being forged. And it convinced in its assertion of the centrality and patriarchal status of Cézanne. The opening reference to Virgil and the striking watercolour of a skull, together with references to the minotaur and the primacy of canonical genres throughout (portrait, landscape, still life) all reminded the viewer of modernism's deep roots in, and engagment with, the classical meditearranean tradition.
Saturday, 5 April 2014
Cézanne and the Modern, Ashmolean
For some reason the Pearlmans didn't acquire Picasso and Matisse; but it was rather refreshing to see early modernist works without the presence of these two Masters. There were works by Lipchitz, van Gogh, Soutine, Modigiliani, Degas, Sisley (a lovely account of a river scene , colours rippling across the pictorial plane) and a remarkable relief piece by Gauguin, 'Te Fare Amu'. The show as a whole brought across the sense of intense exploration and excitement in the early twentieth century, as new pictorial vocabularies were being forged. And it convinced in its assertion of the centrality and patriarchal status of Cézanne. The opening reference to Virgil and the striking watercolour of a skull, together with references to the minotaur and the primacy of canonical genres throughout (portrait, landscape, still life) all reminded the viewer of modernism's deep roots in, and engagment with, the classical meditearranean tradition.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment