Showing posts with label Portraits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Portraits. Show all posts

Thursday, 14 January 2016

Goya, The Portraits (National Gallery)

My last engagement with Francisco de Goya y Lucientes (1746-1828) was the remarkable exhibition of his drawings of witches at the Courtauld last year. Scarcely less vivid was a showing of the Disasters of War prints in Barcelona I came upon some years ago. Where shock in art is concerned this is the real thing, making the efforts of contemporary provocatieurs seem tepid at best. This familiarity (to a degree) with the dark side of this painter's universe makes me a typically modern Goya viewer, more clued up on, and responsive to, his private nightmarish word than the official commissions that earned him a living - religious paintings, tapestry design and portraits. The last of these is the subject of the latest Sainsbury Wing exhibition. The prospect of seeing room after room of portraits of the Great and the Good does not set the pulse pounding; but this exhibition maintains and rewards attention throughout with what it reveals of a remarkable time in Spanish history, and of the relentless interests of its visual record-keeper.

The great and the good have never been less stiff or more exposed. Goya's approach as a portrait artist was precisely to put aside the expectations of pomp and circumstance. He took a strong interest in the personalities of his subjects. 'The Family of the Infante Don Luis de Borbón' (1783-4) is the product not of a formal sitting but of the artist's close familiarity with the exiled prince and his entourage. Although the composition is matching itself against the great forebear Velázquez, there is something Hogarthian in the vivid sense of character and animation in the scene. The same relaxed depiction of the person behind the title comes at us again and again, never more surprisingly than in 'Charles III in Hunting Dress' (1986-8), in which the dazzlingly ugly monarch grins at us, rifle in hand - a different image altogether from the usual portrayal of a king as soldier or wrapped in the robes of state. There was a wider cultural and political point to this: Spain was catching on to the enlightened stirrings going on over the Pyrenees, and Goya was part of this brief liberalising movement in Iberian government and high society. Thus we see young aristocrats enjoying the benefits of a modern education, the Duke of Alba nonchalantly leaning on a fortepiano while leafing through a new score, and family groups where children play, relaxed mothers display fashionable frizzed hairdos and a Rousseauian contentment prevails. The brushwork is correspondingly free and bravura, lovingly capturing the folds and textures of fashionable costumes and a range of expressions in his subjects (if the self-portrait drawing is anything to go by, sitting for Goya must have been a fairly unnerving experience).

The exposure to liberalism was to be a brief one. War with France, the Revolution, a short but profound Spanish Enlightenment, the Napoleonic Empire, Wellington's defeat of Napoleon and eventualy the restoration of the Spanish throne in the figure of the ghastly autocratic Ferdinand VII provide a narrative that gives the steady flow of portraits a compelling underlying dynamic. Certain qualities in Goya transcend the warp and woof chronicle time, such as the naturalism which makes the famous portrait of the Duchess of Alba and the double portrait of Charles IV and María Luisa such a fascinating, Shakespearean examination of human character in its many layers, pomp masking vulnerability, fancy lace mantillas at once ravishingly desirable and pathetically impotent in the face of encroaching age and illness. Friends are depicted with a total commitment to honesty: the architect Juan de Villanueva is shown with uneven eyes and crooked nose, the glint in his eyes an assurance by sitter and artist alike that friendship goes beyond surface errata, and even takes cheer in the natural deformities that nature and history bestow upon us all. In their deep sense of human character, the paintings seem out of their age, most strikingly perhaps in female subjects. Gainsborough could get nowhere near the range of feelings in the portraits of women here: 'Thérèse Louise de Sureda' (1804-6) or 'The Countess of Fernán Nuñez' (1803) are examples of the directness and autonomy of Goya's lady subjects which make orthodoxies of 'the male gaze' seem quite beside the point.

Goya's in-the-headlights frankness seems not to recognise any frontier. The pompous regalia of Fernado VII's portrait succeeds in bringing out the King's dangerous and malevolent stupidity (did Fernado see this? Goya was put through exhausting tests of his loyalty to the regime, and humiliatingly paired with an inferior as official painter to the court). The extraordinary 'Self Portrait with Doctor Arrieta', showing a Goya brought back from somewhere close to the dead, and surrounded by shadowy figures - the phantasms of the black paintings, perhaps - take this unflinching honesty into the realm of self-depiction. It is this capacity for looking at faces and recording them as they really are, for seeing the person whole, that makes the exhibition more than a collection of portraits, and turns it into a vision of life that we can take as a moral lesson. Those who knew Goya in his exile in Bordeaux - old, ill, profoundly deaf - remarked on his boundless curiosity in the world around him. There's a a black crayon self-portrait, with flowing white beard as he moves on two sticks, with the simple heading 'Aun aprendo' (I'm still learning). There was certainly much to be learned - about Goya, Spain, and looking - in this exhibition curated by Xavier Bray. I found the Spanish version of the audioguide extremely helpful. Bray and other experts warn us not to 'read in' the Goya of the Black Paintings into the portrait work, much of which was produced earlier; T J Clark in the LRB isn't so sure, noting points of tension in the background and composition that suggest inner dramas at work. I'm still at the much more basic stage of feeling I've met Spanish nobles and royals of over two centuries ago and listened in on their thoughts and conversations, seen them across the grave through the alchemy of art. How much truth, how much fiction in this vision? How much faith in the eyes and hand of the Master? Aun aprendo.

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

Portraits in Winchester

Robbie Wraith, 'Tina Wraith'
There is an exhibition of portraits going on in Winchester at the moment, shared by various Jewry Street spaces. The Gallery in Winchester Discovery Centre has a selection of portraits by members of the Royal Society of Portrait Painters. Rather than commissioned works, these are paintings from the artists' private collections, under the heading 'Family; Familiar'. Portraiture is a good example of 'The more you know, the less you know'. Direct and up-close images allow you to scan a face far more than you ever can in real life; and the more you observe, the more you want to know about the sitter. What is their story? Where is this room? What did they do the day before, and what thoughts went through their mind during the process of being portrayed? Around a still moment in a life, we weave a narrative. It's a journey pthat recently inspred a National Portrait Gallery publication, Imagined Lives. In this exhibition, the text accompanying the pieces helped to piece out the human story behind it, sometimes rather touchingly.




There is plenty to admire in a formal sense - a mixture of media, from popular oil to egg tempera (Anthony williams's fascinatingly lucid and detailed 'Portrait of Caroline' (2011), to an Anthony Connolly pencil sketch and a charcoal sketch by Robbie Wraith of his wife Tina, which I found arrestingly delicate and engaging - my breath-catching moment of the show. I liked the mysterious play of angles, surfaces and reflections in Michael Taylor's 'Woman Cradling Glass Vessel' (2010), and the optical tricks in the same artist's 'Couple', in which his wife's hair is parted to reveal a painting he made of them at the age of 17 entitled 'Flying'. Carpets lift, impossible apertures emerge, but all somehow contribute to the emtoional pull of the whole work. Paul Brason's 'Eighteen' confronts us with a young man of presumably that age, a Vermeer-like cast of light from the window falling across the door behind and bringing out the folds in his black shirt. There's an air of vulnerability mixed with confidence that made me think of Titian's 'Ranuccio Farnese', which is the highest praise of which I'm capable. Brason's small portrait of Roy Strong had an immediate, affectionate feel. I was fascinated by the story behind Toby Wiggins's 'Self-Portrait after George' (2013). The artist has for years been intrigued by the self-portrait by George Spencer Watson (1869-1934), and eventually made his own self-portrait modelled on it, painted in the same room and house as the original. But all the pieces are impressive, and make a fine riposte to anyone still claiming the art of painting is dead, or in recession.
Downstairs in City Space, an exhibition '9 out of 10 Believe' presents a series of figures, portrayed by three different artists: Mark Michael (satirist), Evelina Dee-Shepherd (realist) and Ben Mousley (expressionist). I found it hard to get into this: there was too much text for my taste, either as part of the images themselves, or accompanying the individuals; and the knowledge that what we were told veered from biographical fact to complete fabrication was irritating rather than compelling. The general air of attempted cleverness clouded any sense of the personal. Well, most of the work is sold so others clearly 'got it' better than I did.

Also in City Space is 'Winchester Death Masks', but this merits a separate post.

Tuesday, 3 January 2012

Imagined Lives

Last time I was in the National Gallery I was looking at a painting of a young man (by Titian, I think) and I wondered what difference our knowledge - or ignorance - of the subject makes to the way we look at a portrait. As Richard Brilliant points out in his book on portraiture it seems an absolutely standard move to look at the label, often before we look at the picture. But why? It seems much less urgent, somehow, to know exactly which bit of landscape is being shown or which street. Portraits seem to be more connected with their referent, somehow. All of which makes the NPG's new venture, Imagined Lives, especially interesting. Writers have been shown fourteen anonymous portraits from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and asked to come up with stories about them. There's a publication, a podcast, and a competition so you can have a go yourself. Alexander McCall smith has a nice short piece on this in today's Daily Telegraph. On until July 22nd.