Wednesday 12 August 2015

Stanley Spencer, Sandham Memorial Chapel, Burghclere


 

Washing Lockers
Sandham Memorial Chapel is an undemonstrative redbrick building by Lionel Pearson, in the Hampshire village of Burghclere. Small and low, with two almshouses as wings, it sits at the end of a lawn, partially screened from the road by trees and fence, quite at home in a landscape of green fields, thick hedgerows and temperate winds. The Chapel is an Oratory of All Souls, and was dedicated in 1927 as a private memorial to Lieutenant Willoughby Sandham, who died in 1919 from an illness contracted in the Macedonian campaign.

 

This unobtrusive place is also one of the most remarkable monuments to have emerged from a war in any country, for its interior walls are painted by Stanley Spencer, with scenes recollected from his own war experience and transfigured into deeply religious images. At one remove from the bustle and publicity of galleries, and detached from the relentless rush of media images of today’s conflicts, the Chapel, and the masterpiece it houses, offers something increasingly rare – an apt space for contemplating serious things. It is a quiet place in which to consider war, and man in war, and the redeeming powers of art.

 

The paintings of Sandham Memorial chapel are rooted in the personal experience of the artist. The bare facts can be briefly told. In 1915 the 24-year-old Stanley Spencer enlisted in the Royal Army Medical Corps and was stationed as a medical orderly at the Beaufort war Hospital in Bristol. In August the next year he volunteered for active service overseas and, after training at Tweseldon Camp near Farnham in Surrey, was stationed in Salonika (in Macedonia) with the 68th field Ambulances. In October 1917 Spencer retrained as an infantryman with the 7th Battalion of the Royal Berkshire Regiment, and spent some months on the front line. All of these places figure in the Sandham paintings. A bout of malaria brought Spencer home, where, under orders as a commissioned official war artist, he painted the first of his works dealing with war, Travoys with Wounded Soldiers arriving at a Dressing Station at Smol, Macedonia (1919, now in the Imperial War Museum).

 

Travoys is not part of the Sandham scheme, but it anticipates in theme and technique much of what Spencer was to explore in the later work. Its subject is not the destruction of battle, but rather man’s capacity for creative, collaborative work. It is about the making of persons, not the breaking of bodies. In harmonious alliance with the men, a line of mules brings the wounded on stretchers to a dressing station. Mules and men look towards a lighted space beyond them, where medical staff treat a patient. Positioned above and behind the group, like a ghostly spectator, we look in too. The scene is imbued with lineaments of Christian iconography: we are reminded of the shepherds and kings looking on at the glowing stable of the infant Christ. These echoes of the miraculous are resolutely located in the real: the details of uniforms and harness are carefully recorded, and nothing is happening that could not have happened. Yet the scene has a powerful atmosphere of transcendence: the emphasis is not on the characters as individuals but on the way they are bound together by work and mutual help into a compact of fellowship. Drama is evoked by a steep, almost vertical perspective, which makes the pictorial space seem to thrust itself towards us. The scene also anticipates the Sandham pictures with its suggestion of a narrative, taking us from darkness to light, from suffering to salvation. The mules, for which the artist evidently had a special affection, are to return, at the centre of the great Resurrection scene on the East wall of the Chapel.

 

Over the next few years, Spencer produced some of his great explicitly religious paintings, concentrating in particular on scenes from the Passion. But memories of war burned within him: the Macedonian landscape reappears, for example, in Crucifixion, taking the place of his usual setting, his home village of Cookham. In 1923 he was staying with the painter Henry Lamb, according to his host sitting ‘at a table all day evolving acres of Salonica and Bristol war compositions’. By chance the two painters were visited by Mr and Mrs J L Behrend (she was Sandham’s sister) who very soon decided to commission Spencer’s work as the memorial work it is today.

 

Spencer is said to have replied to the commission with the comment ‘What ho, Giotto!’, and Sandham Chapel is influenced in terms of concept and arrangement by Giotto’s Arena Chapel in Padua (though an early experiment in imitating Giotto to the extent of using fresco failed). Spencer was closely involved in the architectural design, framing the sequence of images in arches and predella panels, and exploiting the large spaces of upper wall spaces and the east wall to create complex large-scale compositions.

 

The context of the chapel affects our reading of the paintings, too. They refer to each other in ways which would be impossible in a gallery setting. The rhythm of arches, the disposition of small and large spaces, creates a visual drama which depends on the space and light of this particular architectural setting. Throughout, we feel a powerful religious imagination, whereby minutely observed everyday items and daily routines are invested with symbolic meaning. This is the journey of Everyman from darkness and pain to the homecoming of the Resurrection and the revelation of the sanctity of ordinary experience. It is, in the artist’s words, ‘a mixture of real and spiritual fact’. Like Joyce’s Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, it has at its centre the notion of epiphany, whereby normal things and events reveal great mysteries.

 

This inhabitation of the concrete and material by the spiritual is clear in the very first painting in the first arch on the north wall, Convoy Arriving. A squat, colourful bus bearing wounded soldiers arrives at the Beaufort War Hospital. The gates are swung open to allow its entry. The details are based on remembered experience: a mean-looking warder is apparently based on a real individual; his keys are the Burghclere chapel keys, and the rhododendrons outside the gates are from Burghclere too. Everything represented is taken from the real world. But in being painted it is transposed to a new order of meaning. The opening image of an entry echoes our own entry into the Chapel and signals an interior journey which will match the physical journey of the soldiers’ healing. In the space of the chapel, connotations play on the mind. Gates opening and keys suggest the keys of St Peter at the gates of heaven, but equally, with the power of the bus and the stern warder, the Harrowing of Hell; as the bus leaves the dense flowers for the bare drive, we seem to see, repeated, the story of Adam and Eve’s expulsion from Eden and entry to the hardship of mortal life. As with Travoys, we notice a lack of individualising expression among the patients, and a curious absence of distinct intimate relationships: the people are bound together by situation, by shared action, simply by being together.

 

Spencer’s pictures allude to Christian iconography, and also have relations of tone and meaning with each other. Beneath Convoy Arriving is the first predella picture, Scrubbing the Floor. All the predella pictures stress the floor, the earth, and in them the vertiginous perspective flattens out into a gravity-bound underworld – here marked by dark corridors and the inner darkness of the troubled man obsessively scrubbing the floor. His mental distress, and the awkward movements of the three others who step around him, mark an emotional shift after the expectations of the wounded above. It is through descent into this world, Spencer seems to be hinting, through the discipline of menial work, that we are to be truly reunited and healed. Perhaps, in the man’s body and the proximity of his hands to another man’s feet, we catch an echo of Christ washing the feet of his disciples.

 

Once our mind is open to the play of associations, with no fixed theological or narrative frame to restrict them, then we construe Christian allusions throughout. Ablutions is a baptism, a representation of inner cleansing, with the pattern of raised arms striking a gentle uplifting note. The laid-out mats on which men lie in Kit Inspection are the graves in which the dead wait for judgment, laying out their account of themselves, each in his lonely space. And in the astonishing Dug-Out / Stand-To, the soldiers are again somewhere between life and death, between two worlds as they wait apprehensively for an onslaught, anticipated in the cloud of barbed wire that seems about to descend. The trenches are open graves, but this death is only a prelude to the Resurrection on the Eastern wall, to which some men look in hope.

 

The Resurrection is a composition on a grand scale, yet the individual details avoid the loud rhetoric of grandeur. There are no heroic gestures, no postures or expressions of wonderment. The resurrected shake hands, pile up their crosses and get on with the business of presenting themselves to Christ, a small figure who seems rather overwhelmed by it all. As in Pasolini’s film of St Matthew’s Gospel, the business of salvation is entirely unceremonious. One man cuts another free from barbed wire. Another is greeted by his dog.  Some wind puttees. The soldier on the smashed mule cart sits bemused, while driver and the mules start to turn to Christ. What is moving is the way in which all seem to address this salvation as if it were an absolutely normal activity. Just as the ordinary is transfigured into spiritual symbol in Spencer, so the great providential events become everyday happenings.

 

Iconographic references are equally rich on the southern wall: the soldiers like angels with their floating army macs in Filling Water Bottles; the dormitory feast image of bread and jam below in Tea in the Hospital Ward, where the food might be the feeding of the five thousand, and, taken in conjunction with the water above, a kind of Eucharist. Yet the images survive the solemnity of such interpretation, for each one preserves a real and interesting moment of human experience, of the life of work and survival around the terrible fact of war.

 

In Sandham Memorial Chapel Spencer, who experienced war’s depredations first-hand as a private soldier (he was in the ranks throughout), is committed to finding a path to redemption. And he does this in a tradition of English mysticism, in which a connection is found between simple external detail and deep spiritual sensation, a mode of perception which stems from the simple language of the New Testament itself: we find the same sensibility of the numinous in the local, for example, in the writings of T F Powys.  It is a vision beautifully described by Ivor Gurney:

 

            I believe in the increasing of life: whatever

            Leads to the seeing of small trifles,

            Real, beautiful, is good …

   …nor is anything done

            Wiselier than the moving or breaking to sight

            Of a thing hidden under by custom – revealed,

            Fulfilled, used (sound-fashioned) any way out to delight:

            Trefoil – hedge sparrow – the stars on the edge of night.

            (The Escape)

 

Spencer, who when painting Ablutions spent half an hour trying to remember what a sponge looked like then went home to get his own, would have agreed with this. His art leads to the seeing of small trifles, and in so doing elucidates the space of the soul. Born out of war, and charged with a love of creation, Sandham Memorial Chapel is, in every brushstroke, an increasing of life.  It exists in counterpoint to the powerful and distressing visions of other war artists like Nash and Nevinson. How appropriate that, like Giotto’s Arena Chapel, it was dedicated on 25th March, the date of the Feast of the Annunciation, a visitation of earth by heaven.

No comments: